shellbyzfan33 Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 George W. Bush has failed America on the economy, civil liberties, the environment, nuclear proliferation and, most unforgivable, on national security by leading us into a demonstrably unnecessary war in Iraq that has distracted our attention from and diminished our capability to fight a comprehensive global war on terror." Quote
shellbyzfan33 Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 http://www.ericblumrich.com/idiot.html Quote
Blue Duece Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 A:f*ck BUSH!!!!!!! name one god damn good thing he has accomplished since he has been in office??????????? B:and ass for all u assholes ripping on kerry about his time in vietnam----- how the f*ck can u say a fucking word????? A: your probally right... we shouldnt have fucked with Hitler either that cost a couple of american lives B: I saw it first hand, what were you doin in 1969? Quote
shellbyzfan33 Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 In the 18 months since President Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq, justifying the decision by saying that Saddam Hussein was "a gathering threat" to the United States, Americans have come to realize that Iraq had no chemical, nuclear or biological weapons, plus that Iraq had no factories to produce these weapons and that its ability to resume production was growing more feeble every year. While sadam still had dreams of someday getting back into the chemical warfare business, his chosen target was Iran, not the United States. Quote
shellbyzfan33 Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 http://www.votebushout.biz/animation.asp Quote
bigboybanshee Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 I'm not one to get into political debates or anything like that, and I'm not posting this to start any arguments, etc...I received this in an email from a friend the other day and I figured I would share....this one is basically discussing the "support/evidence" if you will that Bush received from the democratic party regarding the attack on Iraq "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D -MD), and others Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless > > >using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001 "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct 3, 2002 "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapon stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 Quote
bigboybanshee Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 Here's another one I got in an email from a friend Some claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One person recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember. It was started by terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. Worst president in history? Come on! Quote
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted October 13, 2004 Report Posted October 13, 2004 Duece, What do you think of Kerry's 12.8% tax rate? i think he's blowin smoke, the problem is he never says the same thing twice Duece, I think you took that the wrong way. I meant what did you think of Kerry and Heinz Kerry only paying 12.8% on their combined income of $6.8 million. Compared to the Bush Quote
97banshrider Posted October 14, 2004 Report Posted October 14, 2004 well i will tell ya'll one thing i love to ride and i'm going to vote for the one person who doesn't support the damn sierra club, and pose a threat to those riding areas i enjoy Quote
Blue Duece Posted October 14, 2004 Report Posted October 14, 2004 Here's another one I got in an email from a friend Some claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One person recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember. It was started by terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. Worst president in history? Come on! Godamm thats so on check, but lets not loose sight of the fact that Kerry is the Mesiah and Bush is the anti-christ...i still say dont drop the soap around Kerry Quote
bansheefreak Posted October 14, 2004 Report Posted October 14, 2004 i just watched the last debate.......chalk up another one for bush!!!!!! Quote
bigboybanshee Posted October 14, 2004 Report Posted October 14, 2004 i just watched the last debate.......chalk up another one for bush!!!!!! I didn't get to watch it last night so that's a comforting thought Quote
bird213 Posted October 14, 2004 Report Posted October 14, 2004 Chalk what up for Bush He has said nothing that warrants a victory. I will not talk about him for he is our leader. However, four more years without worring about what the American people think, say bu-bye to any overtime and your pensions... I'm not rich, therefore I cannot vote right wing. Also, if you were in Iraq fighting w/o body armor would you feel safe? No one should be there w/o proper protection. My brother is a Special Forces instructor @ Bragg, he has 5 set of armor and those kids have none. We have proved our point, lets leave. We will never bring that nation to stand for freedom. They hate eachother and the world, how do you stop that? Let them figure it out, when they are stable we help rebuild. Vote Kerry, mixing oil w/gas @ whatever the ratio will be affordable Quote
bigboybanshee Posted October 14, 2004 Report Posted October 14, 2004 Vote Kerry, mixing oil w/gas @ whatever the ratio will be affordable I thought Kerry was the one wanting to shut down riding areas because of the pollution, etc? Vote for Kerry and you won't be mixing any gas at all Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.