Jump to content

Anyone running a steel clutch basket?


Recommended Posts

Thanks for the input Tim. At this point it doesn't matter what you or anybody says, these guys have made up their minds.

 

The added basket weight gives you all the same benefits that added flywheel weight does without hurting the RPM Rev or robbing horsepower.

 

I would think the added torque, ridability, performance, wear resistance would be well worth $160. For a woods Banshee the steel basket is one of the best upgrades for the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input Tim. At this point it doesn't matter what you or anybody says, these guys have made up their minds.

 

The added basket weight gives you all the same benefits that added flywheel weight does without hurting the RPM Rev or robbing horsepower.

 

I would think the added torque, ridability, performance, wear resistance would be well worth $160. For a woods Banshee the steel basket is one of the best upgrades for the money.

In all seriousness. ...do you plan on running one at the BHQ ride?

 

Sent from a van down by the river

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is where you are mistaken..  Adding rotational weight will take away from HP.  Put it on a dyno and you'll see it.  It will slow down acceleration while increasing tractability.  Its common physics.  It will take additional HP to accelerate the additional rotating weight at the same rate.  Opposite is true to removing rotating weight.  Is there benefits??  sure..  but it comes at a expense.  Please dont confuse "added torque" with increased crank inertia. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is where you are mistaken..  Adding rotational weight will take away from HP.  Put it on a dyno and you'll see it.  It will slow down acceleration while increase tractability..  its common physics.  It will take additional HP to accelerate the additional rotating weight at the same rate.  Opposite is true to removing rotating weight.  Is there benefits??  sure..  but it comes at a expense.  Please dont confuse "added torque" with increased crank inertia.

If there "is" a horsepower loss it's very minimal because the additional weight rides on the transmission not the crank itself like the flywheel. Tim and I both stated that we didn't feel any power loss or RPM restriction with the steel basket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there "is" a horsepower loss it's very minimal because the additional weight rides on the transmission not the crank itself like the flywheel. Tim and I both stated that we didn't feel any power loss or RPM restriction with the steel basket.

 

Your wrong again.. the crank is directly driving the clutch basket via gears..  Ether helical or straight  The basket can not move without the crank moving.  It is additional weight that the engine MUST move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The additional weight of the basket also does not increase traction..

 

That's merely the loss of HP making the tires harder to break loose.

You need to take that up with Hinson, they made that claim. Lets stop beating a dead horse. We all know your opinion on this topic, you made it clear in your first post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would think someone with a degree in applied sciences would know this.

 

The more mass you add, the more force it takes to accelerate that object. The most basic formula shows this, F=ma.

You should focus on formulas you need to do get your EFI System going.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...