locogato11283 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Posted December 30, 2008 ive never run anything but gas.. cant run any other fuel at the ama hillclimbs.. Quote
Snopczynski Posted December 30, 2008 Author Report Posted December 30, 2008 easy, overall, 1 is worst, 2 is middle and 3 is the best, for overall power... chart one max rpm was at only 50 HP chart 2, max was like 60 and it chart 3 it hit about 65 hp chart 1 = 1 chart 2=2 chart 3=3 im almost certain The hp numbers between the two different dynos is null and cant be compared. You can only compare the curves. Quote
Snopczynski Posted December 30, 2008 Author Report Posted December 30, 2008 I am also a big fan of PC pipes. I run the same setup with only pwk 33, still very good bottom and good topend. I am curious what exh and transfer duration you run, just for comparison.. I know you would probably don't say, which is fair.. I would love to run my bike against yours to compare the bottom and mids, with my porting which is a low exh and qute high transfer the 33pwks perform better, believe it or not. The software I use showed that even this stock stroke motor with this setups WANTS bigger carbs and the bottom is still killer.. Great post man! Exhaust Duration is 187 degrees. Quote
2strokespirit Posted December 31, 2008 Report Posted December 31, 2008 :-) suppose the transfers is 128-130! Quote
Snopczynski Posted December 31, 2008 Author Report Posted December 31, 2008 :-) suppose the transfers is 128-130! The transfer heights are still stock. Quote
wacko2000 Posted January 12, 2009 Report Posted January 12, 2009 Of the 3 charts which one was a rear wheel dyno? Thanks Snop Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.