The Rebel Posted April 24, 2004 Report Posted April 24, 2004 Allright guys, does anyone have a good answer for this one, it's probably been asked before. I'm a new Banshee rider, looking for a little better response from carbs. Would it be better to run the single carb set-up as opposed to a set of 28 or 30mm pwks. I ride tight trails and some hill climbs, and a lot of sand bar drags. Help me out guys. Thanks. Quote
sheerider4life Posted April 24, 2004 Report Posted April 24, 2004 (edited) If i was you I would get the 33mm C.v kit from Trinity Kit its not to cheap but it would work good for your riding style...I have a 33mm...and its sweet Edited April 24, 2004 by sheerider4life Quote
sredish Posted April 24, 2004 Report Posted April 24, 2004 The Banshee Is Almost Done (and a 2-1 trinity) Trinity, 33mm CV Manifold Kit Trinity Cv Single Carb System, does it work? Trinity Single Carb Kit.pros And Cons. Best Carb Size For Mx Trinity Cv Kit, Weighing What You Guys Have Said Single Carb Cv Single Vs Stock Carbs - Dyno That's enough to get you started. Has this question been asked, oh hell yeah. Scott Quote
The Rebel Posted April 25, 2004 Author Report Posted April 25, 2004 Ahhight Looking for a 2-1 with a 33mm air striker now. Anybody? Preciate it. Quote
frocashmoney24 Posted April 25, 2004 Report Posted April 25, 2004 haha yea tons of shit come up with the search, i think nyuk has one for sale Quote
nasty01banshee Posted April 26, 2004 Report Posted April 26, 2004 sounds like your riding style would be perfect for the extra bottom end boost you would gain from the CV kit, i love mine, go with the 35MM PWK.... Quote
baldwinville Posted May 2, 2004 Report Posted May 2, 2004 easy to answer/ one biger carb is better for bottom end and two big carbs will scream at the top of you throttle Quote
Banshee~ Posted May 5, 2004 Report Posted May 5, 2004 Will the Trinity 33mm eat more gas than the stock carbs Quote
evil Posted May 5, 2004 Report Posted May 5, 2004 Will the Trinity 33mm eat more gas than the stock carbs yes it will Quote
sredish Posted May 5, 2004 Report Posted May 5, 2004 easy to answer/ one biger carb is better for bottom end and two big carbs will scream at the top of you throttle a big single 35 will scream at the top of your throttle too, maybe not quite as much as a pair of 33s, but look at how much more power you gain through the midrange. Just my openneeeeoooonnn. Quote
Dark Ranger Posted May 6, 2004 Report Posted May 6, 2004 I haven't noticed mine using any more fuel with the single 35mm. I am still making some adjustments, but it has been running very rich so it should actually get better. It does work great though! Quote
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 6, 2004 Report Posted May 6, 2004 I wouldn't be without a cv unless they don't make one big enough for my motor someday. Huge improvement over stock I have the 35mm and it seemed to me that I was more fuel efficient when compared to stockers but then I added my pipes and now I'm about the same. The CV-2 35 and the DMC 916's really woke my Banshee up it'll smoke everything around me but I can honestly say nobody has anything worth bragging about either. Quote
jeepman380 Posted May 6, 2004 Report Posted May 6, 2004 I have the 35mm setup on my shee and I love it. Jetting is sooooo easy. If you were going to get one I would go with the 35mm carb instead of the 33mm. You can get the 35mm setup for the price of the 33mm off eBay. Quote
roosthrower Posted May 6, 2004 Report Posted May 6, 2004 I read on macdizzy that the single carb does infact feed both cylinders for a small period of time. Two stroke motors reeds don't get closed off as fast as most think they do. The reeds will still be open in some cases 90 degress ATDC while the other banshee cylinder is at 90 degrees BTDC for the normal intake-compression stroke. Two carbs will always produce more power than a large single for this reason. Imo each cylinder deserves its on carb. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.