adrenaline junky Posted December 19, 2006 Report Posted December 19, 2006 Ive heard that plus 3 a-arms wont handle very well in the dunes, is that true? Give me some information on both of them! Quote
Hollister_Hitman Posted December 19, 2006 Report Posted December 19, 2006 I don't see how that could be possible. Wider is better unless you ride in tight trails and the dunes are not tight trails. Also do yourself a favor and get +2+1 a-arms or +3+1 a-arms. Quote
ThE_BaNsHeE_mAn88 Posted December 20, 2006 Report Posted December 20, 2006 in dirtwheels they tested two dune yfz450's one was stock width and the other was +3. they both had after market shocks and a arms. and they said the stock width yfz handled way better than the +3 bike. i guess it would be harder to turn a bike so wide. Quote
Hollister_Hitman Posted December 20, 2006 Report Posted December 20, 2006 I guess it could be but it would still be way more stable Quote
EastCoast Banshee Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 I have +3+1 a-arms all i can say is it beats the shit out of stock. I dont see how the hell stock a-arms would be better but hey its dirtwheels they get paid to say that. :tongue: Quote
sanddragon2004 Posted December 22, 2006 Report Posted December 22, 2006 on banshees id stick with +2+1 arms nothing more. unless you are going to go with a yfz 450 geometry front end conversion. Quote
Dgrey Posted January 13, 2007 Report Posted January 13, 2007 on banshees id stick with +2+1 arms nothing more. Please explain why. :shoothead: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.