1800bigk Posted December 29, 2004 Report Posted December 29, 2004 (edited) What is the horsepower difference between big carbs (34mm) and k&n clamp ons vs big carbs and air box with no lid. Is the difference really noticable or is it negligible? Also is there a big difference in main jet for those setups or will they be fairly close? thanks Edited December 29, 2004 by 1800bigk Quote
Banchetta Posted December 29, 2004 Report Posted December 29, 2004 What is the horsepower difference between big carbs (34mm) and k&n clamp ons vs big carbs and air box with no lid. Is the difference really noticable or is it negligible? Also is there a big difference in main jet for those setups or will they be fairly close?thanks 299211[/snapback] some people claim there is, but when I dynoed my stroker I did a base run w/ the air box and a run w/o the box or filter. NO change....Note: the air box had no cover. Quote
fixitrod Posted December 29, 2004 Report Posted December 29, 2004 I run a stroker with a box and no lid. I dought I'd get much if any better results with pods. Quote
1800bigk Posted December 29, 2004 Author Report Posted December 29, 2004 ok great, I really didnt want to run clamp ons because the water where I ride, so I'll just keep them with air box no lid. Quote
05bansh Posted December 29, 2004 Report Posted December 29, 2004 I run clamp on k&n's. I think it is a personal preference thing. I have some people tell me they swear by clamp ons, and other people tell me they will never run clamp ons. Quote
sheefreak Posted December 29, 2004 Report Posted December 29, 2004 ok great, I really didnt want to run clamp ons because the water where I ride, so I'll just keep them with air box no lid. 299327[/snapback] I have run both, and I cannot physically feel a difference in power. But the clamp ons do not like water. Quote
05bansh Posted December 30, 2004 Report Posted December 30, 2004 I have run both, and I cannot physically feel a difference in power. But the clamp ons do not like water. 299387[/snapback] This is very true! Whenever I wash my bike I put a big bag around the pods and then use a zip tie to seal it...seems to work pretty good. Quote
FlatTrackinIt55 Posted December 30, 2004 Report Posted December 30, 2004 This is very true! Whenever I wash my bike I put a big bag around the pods and then use a zip tie to seal it...seems to work pretty good. 299505[/snapback] i do the same thing tomy pods..i put rubber band on though.. guess im cheaper.. Quote
05bansh Posted December 30, 2004 Report Posted December 30, 2004 i do the same thing tomy pods..i put rubber band on though.. guess im cheaper.. 299651[/snapback] I was going to use a rubber band, but I couldnt find one Quote
richybanshee Posted December 30, 2004 Report Posted December 30, 2004 (edited) Probably clamp ons let you get a little more HP because you are feeding the motor with more air. Not a good choice if water is involve. In my opinion if you are trail ridding do not take the airbox off. Else if you only drag race or ride in sunny, shinny, beautifull, waterless conditions, then go for it. more air = more fuel = more power Defenetly jetting is involve, do not know how big in the mains. Edited December 30, 2004 by richybanshee Quote
05bansh Posted December 31, 2004 Report Posted December 31, 2004 I ran my shee the other day. I had 250 mains in, seemed to be running pretty good. Quote
Ducman Posted December 31, 2004 Report Posted December 31, 2004 I would say if you are going from a K&N in the box with no lid to clamp-ons it would only be a slight difference, possibly neglidgeable difference like others have said. If you were to go from a foam filter in the box w/lid off to either foam or K&N clamp-ons then it makes a fair amount of difference. I did this and installed 2 sizes larger main and after doing several WOT plug checks and a plug chop, it apears to leaner than before and a noticeable top end power increase. The increase could partially be from leaning out the mains a little but it has to have increased air flow as well to be leaner with 2 sizes larger mains. Quote
roosthrower Posted December 31, 2004 Report Posted December 31, 2004 (edited) pods are cheaper and much easier to work with though. I hate the stock air box especially since I went up to the dual 34's. I ordered these yesterday. cheap pod filters link Edited December 31, 2004 by roosthrower Quote
bone450 Posted January 3, 2005 Report Posted January 3, 2005 I got pissed at the stock airbox while trying to install my new 28mm pwk's. I had to run reed spacers so the carbs would clear the clutch arm making it a bitch to get the airbox on. I ended up breaking the airbox in the cold wisconsin weather. Then tried a few other ways to get the airbox on till I finally kicked it and really broke it. I then went inside and orders 2 uni pods for it. I also ordered some delta 2's for good measure. Good bye to that stinking airbox. I hope the pods make it easier to work on and makes changing the jets easier. Quote
racer Posted January 3, 2005 Report Posted January 3, 2005 pods are cheaper and much easier to work with though. I hate the stock air box especially since I went up to the dual 34's. I ordered these yesterday. cheap pod filters link 300275[/snapback] that sucks. those are the same pods used on SDG's and they blow. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.