banshee(911) Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 well ive been wondering for a while now and is there that much diff. from the 87 tranny and the new ones?i know the gearing is diff but is it that much? thanx Ray Quote
yamahaman244 Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 hey man I have been wondering the same thing because I have 87 and everyone says they were the best year and the fastest don't know if it's true Quote
banshee(911) Posted May 31, 2009 Author Report Posted May 31, 2009 well it says in the clymers manual that 1987 to 1989 had 42:13 (3.230) and the 1990 and up is 41:14 (2.929) i was just wondering what the diff was not sure but i think the 87-89 has more top end but (not sure) Quote
yamahaman244 Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 Ya my dad had a 89 and his friends got a 90 and up he said his would kill there's and they were stock so there must have bee. A differance but idk Quote
ohiobanshee Posted May 31, 2009 Report Posted May 31, 2009 It's not in the tranny,it's in the sprockets. Quote
banshee(911) Posted May 31, 2009 Author Report Posted May 31, 2009 It's not in the tranny,it's in the sprockets. no theres a difference in the tranny Quote
RZBansheeMan Posted June 1, 2009 Report Posted June 1, 2009 There were not any differences in the internal gearing on the Banshee, the only difference was from the RZ. The differnces in the Banshee were external sprocket gearing, the very first and second year maybe and that was because they came with a taller rear tire than the later ones. Look up the history on the Banshee. Mike Quote
banshee(911) Posted June 1, 2009 Author Report Posted June 1, 2009 well it says in the clymers manual that 1987 to 1989 had 42:13 (3.230) and the 1990 and up is 41:14 (2.929) i was just wondering what the diff was not sure but i think the 87-89 has more top end but (not sure) i looked it up in the clymers and under tranny this is what came up Quote
shanYE west Posted June 1, 2009 Report Posted June 1, 2009 i looked it up in the clymers and under tranny this is what came up Yeah.. thats the sprocket ratio. 42 rear.. 13 front (42 / 13 = 3.230) stock gearing on the 90+ is 41 rear.. 14 front (41 / 14 = 2.928) Quote
banshee(911) Posted June 1, 2009 Author Report Posted June 1, 2009 Yeah.. thats the sprocket ratio. 42 rear.. 13 front (42 / 13 = 3.230) stock gearing on the 90+ is 41 rear.. 14 front (41 / 14 = 2.928) man do i feel like a dunce Quote
yamahaman244 Posted June 1, 2009 Report Posted June 1, 2009 mine must not be stock my back one is 43 idk about the frount does that mean it is geared lower Quote
ohiobanshee Posted June 1, 2009 Report Posted June 1, 2009 Yes,bigger in the back is lower,smaller is higher. Just the opposite of the front,bigger is higher,smaller is lower. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.