Snopczynski Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Chart 1 Chart 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BellicoseBanshee Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Due to the fact that you have been answering many 2 into 1 questions lately, I take it this is a comparison between a 2 into 1 set-up and dual carb set-up on the same bike and tester... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodie Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 its either 2 into 1 vs dual carbs... Or (xxxxx) pipes vs pro circuits I know you support pro circuits big time. Its one of the two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheerider1026 Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 so you are getting some different results.. nothing was changed on the bike?? i assume it is ported.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopczynski Posted December 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 its either 2 into 1 vs dual carbs... Or (xxxxx) pipes vs pro circuits I know you support pro circuits big time. Its one of the two. So what chart did you like more, and why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodie Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 I voted for 2 cuz got overall hp gains and torque anyone can see that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopczynski Posted December 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 so you are getting some different results.. nothing was changed on the bike?? i assume it is ported.. It is ported. There was one thing changed between the two tests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheerider1026 Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 2nd chart.. more power and tourqe... what was different on the bike?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodie Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Maybe I can't see it right be it looks like chart 2 made a few less HP's in the low end as chart 1 did but had more top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopczynski Posted December 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 2nd chart.. more power and tourqe... what was different on the bike?? Now are we going of shear max hp and torque numbers here? Or are we looking at power curve broadness, torque backup numbers, different hp and torque numbers throughout the range? How about curve smoothness and max rpm? Anyone notice they are on different scaling because of the difference in power? Anyone want to know what some of the stuff I just said is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopczynski Posted December 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Maybe I can't see it right be it looks like chart 2 made a few less HP's in the low end as chart 1 did but had more top. Look at the reference card with all the numbers. Thats the hp and torque sampling at different rpms. I would have to believe that your statement could tend to be true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheerider1026 Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 yea it made more hp up top on #2. and didn't really lose any power.. made about 5 or 6 more hp.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodie Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 Start writing the book I'm ready to read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopczynski Posted December 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 yea it made more hp up top on #2. and didn't really lose any power.. made about 5 or 6 more hp.. So you think both charts are comprable but #2 being better because of better hp on top? I dont want to lead anyone on, I wants some good analyzation and commenting on these charts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheerider1026 Posted December 24, 2008 Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 dam the anticipation!! lol.. i bet this is a 2into 1 versus stock carbs.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.