LaegerEliminator
-
Posts
6,149 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by LaegerEliminator
-
-
Well that explains why Fred Flintstone was in line ahead of me the day I came for some dyno time.He has a flip phone
-
2
-
-
More then I realized too. Good to know.Yea I hadn't found a picture of the comparison. I thought all they had done was just made the bone longer ha. But they made more geometry changes than I had thought.
-
That's a great visual comparison
-
1
-
-
About what date in time did RagunCajun have his Super Serval built?
-
About what date did Controls initiate his motor build with Cam?
-
So, it was stated earlier that Controls had Cam build a super cub in the beginning because the super serval wasn't available.
This was due to a lack of available inventory at the time, right?
Not because the super serval cylinder hadn't been offered by CP yet?
-
Who deleted it?
Controls or Tyler?
-
Ugh!! The suspence!!
-
Thack,
You gained some credibility with your motor mount idea. It seems legit.
If you have any hope of gaining more credibility, Please consider the following for your own benefit:
1) Shorten all of your posts by 60-75%
2) Stop name dropping left and right.
3) Stop typing the same lengthy details over and over repeatedly.
4) Before you click send, proof read what you've typed, then wait again before sending it.
You become totally emotional and over react in most of your rants.
5) This is the most important one:
POST PICTURES!!!!
We need proof!!!!
Less talk, more proof!!!!
-
2
-
-
So, Controls, when are we gonna see an update on the dyno results?
-
2
-
-
And to be even more clear Thack, I've never talked badly about you yet!!
I have asked for proof of some of your past claims, with little no supporting evidence in return from you.
Get your story straight!!!
-
1
-
-
Let's be super clear on a few things Thack:As I stated previously I'll post pictures of the finished product before it's sent to out for heat treating powder coat. The chassis fabricator I'm using is the best I've seen. You've been bashing and talking shit about this idea that many other members have expressed interest in since I brought it up and posted the first generic print. You can argue the superiority of the the 1989 TRX-250R Frame and Suspension Geometry and the Pro-Trax Front End over the 2009 and newer YFZ-450R Frame and Suspension Geometry all you want, I'm not buying it and given time I don't anybody else will either.
When I first saw you make posts, I gave you the benefit of having a few good ideas long after others had been bashing you.
It wasn't until I watched you spew multiple encyclopedia length posts, repeatedly, that made zero sense at all, that I shifted my idea of giving you the benefit of the doubt.
I am one of the few on here who have a realistic, first hand appreciation for what a 250R based chassis can actually do in performance over an oem chassis.
In your posts you're constantly dropping names and giving lengthy details in your effort to prove yourself, yet we still don't see any actual proof of legit pictures of this unicorn build that you have boldly discussed for years now.
SO...... Show us some proof!!
-
1
-
-
Let's see current pics of this frame.
In its current state. ASAP
-
Getting my popcorn ready
-
With the aftermarket chassis, be prepared to have to "massage" a lot of parts, pieces and components into place.
Very few items will have a factory, oem type fit.
-
Once a guy learns his balance point and throttle control, you can go a long ways.I've got a vid of me on the kxf doing one for 2.5 miles without coming down. I had to stop because there was a intersection. I cannot post it on here though, to big of a file. I got 9 miles on one tire riding van dyke express way.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
-
The ultra smooth power of the 450 makes it much easier to ride long wheelies.This.
The banshee has a balance point that feels really far back.
I can't really wheelie the banshee any where near as well as I can the 450.
Maybe the motor has a bit to do with it, but i think i have to much power at the wrong time.
Every 450 I've ever jumped on were very easy to wheelie thru the gears aost immediately.
The banshee definitely takes additional effort and skill.
-
Gotchayeap! was the reason I got it, when the RPMS where up and you had to pull the clutch heffer had some tension
Mine seemed the same most of the way up thru the rpm.
-
I'm a pretty patient guy in most situations.I actually came across your old thread way back when you ran it... like I had mentioned in it... you need to dial it in with the clutch screw as well as adjust the slave cylinder or else its not going to work well... but yea very finicky to get dialed in, just once its set its good to go and works well.
prob more of a pain to set up then most want to deal with non the less
I did get mine to work, but it was definitely a chore to get it dialed in.
Are you running yours along with a lock out too?
-
I tried to run a streamline unit and found it very frustrating to deal with. It would work, but very finicky.Do you have good luck running that hyd clutch? I always wanted to try one but people that i know that ran them steered me away from them.
When I switched to a mattoon lock out and cover from Cam and stock springs, I had no reason to try the hydraulic setup again.
-
I see you were riding amongst of group of pretty good people!This weekend was a blast riding with a bunch of new great ppl sharing the love of the Shee's!
-
1
-
-
Went into the gas station tonight to buy some snacks.
The clerk had a Trump 2016 t-shirt on and and a side arm on his hip.
#whereicallhome
-
2
-
-
Of course its an easy pull when you dont have a motor attached to the other end....
-
You won't regret the investment into a lock out.
They work awesome.
Easy pull when using stock springs too.
-
1
-
Manny's MX build
in General Banshee Discussion
Posted
This guy ^^^ and his opinions...