Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I took apart my banshee about 6 months ago and got caught up in some other things and let it sit. I'm putting it back together and I can't figure out how the chain is supposed to be routed on this part. The way I have it now the chain rubs against B so I'm sure it's not correct, any other way I route it the chain seems to have a lot of slack. I know that the polished part in the pic is not stock but I bought the banshee with it on so I don't know exactly what it is... Also, the sprocket for A is kinda worn out, is this a big concern? It ran great before I took it apart.

 

Please help

 

IMG_0065.jpg

Posted

chain needs to go over C.

 

worn sprockets cause chains to jump off. if i were you, id get rid of that whole setup. you adjust the chain tightness back on the swingarm where the carrier is.

Posted
chain needs to go over C.

 

worn sprockets cause chains to jump off. if i were you, id get rid of that whole setup. you adjust the chain tightness back on the swingarm where the carrier is.

 

Ok, makes sense... but if I leave the chain where it is at on the bottom sprocket it looks like it rubs on B still.... right now both are hitting B.

 

Also, can I really just throw this part out and adjust it on the swingarm? If so, why would this part even exist?

 

Thanks!

Posted
Ok, makes sense... but if I leave the chain where it is at on the bottom sprocket it looks like it rubs on B still.... right now both are hitting B.

 

Also, can I really just throw this part out and adjust it on the swingarm? If so, why would this part even exist?

 

Thanks!

yes you can toss it and go back to stock rollers. thats what i would do. i wouldnt run that piece of junk.

Posted
yes you can toss it and go back to stock rollers. thats what i would do. i wouldnt run that piece of junk.

 

 

 

agreed...toss it and run stock rollers and a guide.you're good to go after that.

 

 

as mentioned, keep an eye on your sprockets.you dont want to end up with a case break.

Posted

that is an amp link isn't it? aren't they supposed to help control chain slap and over tensioning when under pressure, like jumping etc? i've heard they are more of a PIA and waste of money than anything. bud you can absolutely ditch that thing and use the stock adjustment system if you wanted to.

Posted
that is an amp link isn't it? aren't they supposed to help control chain slap and over tensioning when under pressure, like jumping etc? i've heard they are more of a PIA and waste of money than anything. bud you can absolutely ditch that thing and use the stock adjustment system if you wanted to.

 

 

Ok, sweet. So I have it totally backwards then. It seems like it's going to rub stuff if I reverse the way it is now. I don't have the stock rollers so can I run it with just removing this part?

Posted

What they actually do is remove chain slack so your rear shock doesn't stiffen up under hard acceleration.

 

In theory.

 

In the annals of worthless banshee products, it goes something like this:

 

1. Boost Bottle

2. Roost Boost

2 1/2. AMP Link

 

Use your stock upper and lower rollers.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...