PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Report Posted December 12, 2015 Did some reading on these through out the forms, sounds like they're hit or miss. Some guys say run the stocker, other say they've seen great improvements using Dyna. Any current thoughts of these pieces? Quote
trickedcarbine Posted December 12, 2015 Report Posted December 12, 2015 For what you're doing, OEM. Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 For what you're doing, OEM.That's what Cam said also, which I always take his word. I was just interested in hearing from other people's know how. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 (edited) OEM, ive never seen a need for a programable one, its not like you NEED to change timing often or NEED a rev limiter..... Just another thing to go wrong imo. I think the revlimiter is great. Wouldn't it be a safe feature to limit the bikes revs electronically rather then what it's capable of mechanically? Plus that shift light output sounds tight. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Edited December 12, 2015 by controls77 Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 So what does a builder do with a curve on his motors? I'll ask Cam eventually. Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 So they change the curve in the stock cdi, correct? Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 Okay, so the curve changes everywhere +4 degrees after the plate is advanced? I'm new to this so I'm trying to understand how it works. Thanks Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 Yes, it is shifted how every much you adjust it. Like +5 setting is +5 shift.Cool ok. Most of my posts here are questions, I'm a young guy wanting to learn everything I can about these quads so pardon all the noob stuff. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 Simple enough man. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 Advancing the timing is just as simple as igniting your mixture at a earlier position of the stroke. Correct? Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 (edited) So retarding the timing from the manufactures specs is usually not a good idea Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Edited December 12, 2015 by controls77 Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 For tuning and finding the sweet spot, okay retarding is an acception. But never further then stock. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Quote
PaymentPlan Posted December 12, 2015 Author Report Posted December 12, 2015 (edited) not really, but some engines might like it (haven't heard of any yet though)We posted at the same time. Has anyone ran more then that and had positive results? Maybe it's possible with unique system. The degree measurement were referring to is directed to the flywheel position correct? Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk Edited December 12, 2015 by controls77 Quote
Bennett131 Posted December 12, 2015 Report Posted December 12, 2015 That's a shitty pic, one moment please Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.