Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
TABLE 2.1 Minimum squish clearances

Cylinder size (cc) Clearance (mm)

50-80 0.6-0.8

100-125 0.7-0.9

175-250 1.0-1.4

300-500 1.1-1.5

 

If this is correct, it should be 0.040'' - 0.055''.

 

Squish on most of my engines is 0.045''

 

The0.035 that I stated before may be a little tight.

 

 

This is the minimun safe clearance; maybe not optimal for your setup, though.

Posted

Dynoport pipe on 93 octane: .045" squish and 160 psi compression ought to work the best. Dynoport only reves to around 8,600 rpm.

 

I usually suggest squish windows within .005", so you could go .045"-.050" Closer you are to the lower the number, typically the better it will run. Its a minimal difference though.

Posted
Dynoport pipe on 93 octane: .045" squish and 160 psi compression ought to work the best. Dynoport only reves to around 8,600 rpm.

 

I usually suggest squish windows within .005", so you could go .045"-.050" Closer you are to the lower the number, typically the better it will run. Its a minimal difference though.

@ .045" do I need the chambers re-cut , or just a flat deck ? this a stock 05 never been apart

Posted

i just checked the squish on the motor im building and its at .060 is this to loose? i have 20 cc domes stock crank. thanks guys.

Posted
i just checked the squish on the motor im building and its at .060 is this to loose? i have 20 cc domes stock crank. thanks guys.

 

 

i would think it is, you may try changing to a thinner base gasket and if that doesnt help, may need to have the domes cut.

Posted
i would think it is, you may try changing to a thinner base gasket and if that doesnt help, may need to have the domes cut.

 

 

so what thickness gasket should i go with?

Posted
so what thickness gasket should i go with?

 

it depends on your current squish reading, and what gasket is currently installed on the head and/or base of the cylinders.

Posted
i just checked the squish on the motor im building and its at .060 is this to loose? i have 20 cc domes stock crank. thanks guys.

 

What is the compression, what is the timing, are you running methanol or gas?

Posted
.073"

 

You could change it and probably benefit from some more compression and a better squish gap. I typically do coolheads though, they bring the squish down where it needs to be and you can set your compression where you want.

Posted
so what thickness gasket should i go with?

 

like snope said, it depends on current base gasket thickness. for example, lets say you have a current squish of .073" and you want to see .050" squish. you will need to have a base gasket that's .023" THINNER than the current base gasket used. if its a stock head, you can easily mill .023" off and be safe.....if its a dome insert style head, you will need to change base gaskets, but you will also lower the rpm that the engine makes peak power at. if a guy didn't want to drop the rpm of peak power, he/she would need the exhaust port, transfers and boost ports raised that same amount that the cylinders were dropped down from the thinner gasket......i believe. guys, correct me if i'm wrong.

Posted

I was assuming that since there is no mention of pipes or cylinder porting we are talking about an otherwise stock motor. My "guesstimate" is based upon an otherwise stock motor w/a 65mm bore, making peak HP at apx. 7800 rpm, a premium pump gas compatable compression ratio, 12mm squish band width and .047" squish thickness. I am figuring an MSV in the mid 20's with this data.

Like you say though, insert the 9,500 to 10,000 rpm data to the above and it is a whole different story... .055" clearance is bare minimum IMHO.

 

 

With T5's and a dune port (or slightly raised exhaust port) I would be running .050"-.055" Thats roughly gonna be for a 9,500-10,000 rpm motor.
Posted

Anybody mind if I add my .02 cents?

 

Snopczynski can chime in and correct me if im wrong but what i believe he is getting at is a tighter squish will create higher pressures and not allow the engine to rev quite as easy or as much...but then again that kinda contradicts the fact that he runs .050"-.055" on a dune port to rev 9500 to 10000 and my bike is just over .041" and i know it revs that hard, so honestly i don't know! :biggrin:

 

I would like to hear his take on this too cause my bike with .041" squish is only about 145psi due to the dome size/shape...so me saying the tighter squish will make higher pressures isn't always true. Im confused too :confused:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...