windy. im wondering where u got the idea of me having a vague understanding of camber and caster. camber was never discussed. i was referring to all that positive caster in these two frames from such a drastic rake. and the other guy thought i ment rake. (this frame and the other thread). i tried to be cool about it and agree with the other guy. but my questions are still left over there unanswered even by matt the suspension guru. if either of u knew the answers u would respond with a real answer.
and matt yea i was telling shearer how childish u are then the tierod angle comes up. and u still dont have ur facts straight. if i go +4 the steering shaft goes +2 = -2" behind stock location. if i go +6, its the same thing always approx 2" behind stock location. now can u remember that? now shearer said what problem is caused by a increased angle. and i said i fixed that by modifying the shaft. then he says, oh ok ur fine then. i said, exactly. now thats word for word so ur story is made up. like most of ur comments regarding me.
oh yea before i forget u were standing there in shearers room and while shearer was telling me how bad my motor was and was laughing at the domes that were in it. he told you all about the motor. then u say" i dont know anything about motors so ill just believe u". quote unquote.
so go ahead and feel like ur somebody on the internet. cause u have most fooled. but i know the truth.
oh and since u supposedly know suspension why were the shocks u took to try on jls bike so far off? they werent even close. ur just guessing at the setup like anyone else can do. but thats right im talking to a suspension guy that obviously knows suspension