Banshee 79 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Posted September 14, 2006 What offset wheel is everyone running with +2 arms, I see most manufacturers recommend 4:1 offset, my wheels now are 2:3 offset. Can you run those with +2 arms or would that stress the arms & shock to much? Thanks Quote
Hollister_Hitman Posted September 14, 2006 Report Posted September 14, 2006 What offset wheel is everyone running with +2 arms, I see most manufacturers recommend 4:1 offset, my wheels now are 2:3 offset. Can you run those with +2 arms or would that stress the arms & shock to much? Thanks I am wondering the same thing. I just ordered some +2+1s and I think I am going to run 3+2s but 4+1s wouldput it where I have it right now with the 2+3s. 4+1 if you needed to lose some width for one ride, but I would say go with the stock 3+2s Quote
EastCoast Banshee Posted September 14, 2006 Report Posted September 14, 2006 it depends what your doing. if your riding woods and you need to be alittle bit narrower go with he 4-1. 4-1 also help with bump steer by moving the center of you tire closer to the ball joints. I have 3-2 on my +3+1 a-arms and im right under 50" and for the woods its damn hard not to catch stuff but when it comes to a track or open places its a dream to have it that wide. I dont know if that helps much but i try. good luck anyways Quote
Banshee 79 Posted September 15, 2006 Author Report Posted September 15, 2006 it depends what your doing. if your riding woods and you need to be alittle bit narrower go with he 4-1. 4-1 also help with bump steer by moving the center of you tire closer to the ball joints. I have 3-2 on my +3+1 a-arms and im right under 50" and for the woods its damn hard not to catch stuff but when it comes to a track or open places its a dream to have it that wide. I dont know if that helps much but i try. good luck anyways Thanks for the reply, so you could run a 2+3 but the bump steer would be worse. Quote
EastCoast Banshee Posted September 15, 2006 Report Posted September 15, 2006 yup exactly but in my oppion its not really an issue to me. Quote
bansheePQ Posted September 16, 2006 Report Posted September 16, 2006 in my opinion and with my experience i'll go with the 4-1 all the way.....less bump steer is so much fun to ride...... Quote
Hollister_Hitman Posted September 17, 2006 Report Posted September 17, 2006 in my opinion and with my experience i'll go with the 4-1 all the way.....less bump steer is so much fun to ride...... I am sure everyone agrees with you, but you would have to order +3 arms to get 4 inches wide with those. Who wouldn't want less bumpsteer? But to sacrifice 2" inches for it? It all depends on your riding location Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.