Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys

 

Recently we started modding a buddies brand spanker, bone stock 07 banshee.

 

We did the following bolt ons:

 

T5 pipes and silencers

Noss head with 21s

K&N filter and billet flange, no lid

Did all the necesary jetting changes, she runs smick

 

so there was no problem with all of that, hes been riding it heaps and drag racing us all a fair bit, it runs real good for what it is, out of about 3 or 4 of my buddies bikes with just bolt ons, it ran the best, won all the races.

 

anyway so after a few weeks we added a timing plate, set it to plus 4.

 

straight away he noticed the increase in bottom end power, so we put the tacho on it and lined it up against another bike to see what it did to the top end.

 

well now with the timing it has knocked 200rpm off of top gear, and the other bike walks away from it in 6th.

 

we kinda thought this would happen, has anyone else experienced this??

 

we are currently looking into a programmable ignition so we can advanced the bottom end and not the top end.

 

sorry for the long post!

 

mark

Posted

yeah, i was just looking on dyna's website, and noticed that none of the curves that come with the unit would suit us.

 

ie, they arent advanced much in the lower rpm, but rather just hold the "advancement" for longer over the mid range and it ends up about 3 degrees advanced on the top end??

 

if i were to draw my own curve, i would probably statically advance the whole first half of the curve by 4 degrees, and then gradually decrease back to stock from about 5500/6000 rpm, where the pipes start working..

 

what do you think?

Posted
yeah, i was just looking on dyna's website, and noticed that none of the curves that come with the unit would suit us.

 

ie, they arent advanced much in the lower rpm, but rather just hold the "advancement" for longer over the mid range and it ends up about 3 degrees advanced on the top end??

 

if i were to draw my own curve, i would probably statically advance the whole first half of the curve by 4 degrees, and then gradually decrease back to stock from about 5500/6000 rpm, where the pipes start working..

 

what do you think?

 

I would start with curve 3 and retard it back down to stock on the very high rpm.

Posted

You can go with a Zeeltronic cdi, but I think you know that? I would do it the same way as you just said... advance it to about 6000rpm and then retard it to standard..

Posted

yeah man, i have a zeeltronic for my RZ, i still havent tried it yet though. once its on, i plan on spending a day on the dyno playing with different ignition curves and also different PV curves.

 

Snop, on my buddies bike I am pretty sure that RPM dropped from 9800 to 9600 with the addition of the timing plate.

 

that is with 15/41 gearing and stock banshee tyres.

 

why do you ask?

 

mark

Posted
yeah man, i have a zeeltronic for my RZ, i still havent tried it yet though. once its on, i plan on spending a day on the dyno playing with different ignition curves and also different PV curves.

 

Snop, on my buddies bike I am pretty sure that RPM dropped from 9800 to 9600 with the addition of the timing plate.

 

that is with 15/41 gearing and stock banshee tyres.

 

why do you ask?

 

mark

 

I would program curve 3 in the dyna and drop the ignition timing back down to stock at about 9k rpm for his curve.

Posted

marksdynatekcurves2nd8.th.png

 

the curve in red is what i would like to try, and if it slowed the upper/mid too much (eg from 5500 onwards) i would modify it with the blue line.

 

the curve in green is what a +4 timing plate would look like.

 

what do yooz think?

 

mark

Posted

I have..

 

I set the plate at zero, and added +8 to every rpm range except the lowest. This was to keep my kick starter from kicking back...but this was on a 14 mil cheetah on alky; and would not necessarily apply here.

 

This has got me re-thinking that curve....I may retard it back to stock in the upper rpm range, just not sure where. Then again, it runs awesome as is (best of 3.72@86mph, 300ft., 130 lb jockey).

Posted

yeah alky is slow burning so the +8 is probly what it needs.

 

maybe it would be worth experimenting with something like +10 through the mid range down to +6 or +4 up top.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...