inthemail Posted February 1, 2008 Report Posted February 1, 2008 i hear there lighter? and use j-arms instead of a-arms. is there any other real differences? im using one for my build, easy to get. Quote
Fireroad Express Posted February 1, 2008 Report Posted February 1, 2008 i got two of them here if ya need it.! used front suspension parts may be cheaper to get for them. not sure if they're lighter or not. brake calipers and spindels are different too(i have a set of those as well). the original rear carrier is also a bit different on J-arm bikes but doesn't matter much. Quote
dajogejr Posted February 1, 2008 Report Posted February 1, 2008 If you're building a drag bike or one that only sees sand, hell yes. But the arms are getting pricier..don't forget, they only made J Arms from 87 to 90...A Arms from there on out. Quote
inthemail Posted February 1, 2008 Author Report Posted February 1, 2008 (edited) i got two of them here if ya need it.! used front suspension parts may be cheaper to get for them. not sure if they're lighter or not. brake calipers and spindels are different too(i have a set of those as well). the original rear carrier is also a bit different on J-arm bikes but doesn't matter much. i didnt know the spindels and calipers were different. think my savings in the frame price will be cancelled out by increased cost in those parts? i had never even thought of this..... bummer * What about aftermarket spindles for j-arm front ends????? Edited February 1, 2008 by inthemail Quote
xXBlessedWithDeathXx Posted February 1, 2008 Report Posted February 1, 2008 (edited) i didnt know the spindels and calipers were different. think my savings in the frame price will be cancelled out by increased cost in those parts? i had never even thought of this..... bummer * What about aftermarket spindles for j-arm front ends????? if you have newer style spindles with the hubs they will work on J-arms but you need both. older spindles dont fit 91 and up hubs. i think it was a 13 or 14 pound difference in the front end. i seen that in the clymer manual. the front brake lines are also different on the J-frame but if you have 91 and up parts they will fit you just need to use every thing but the arms. i have 2 J-arm frames and have no problems in trails or hills. i also put on D-arms to replace the J-arms. i cant say J-arms suck seeing i never had a problem with them but they are gettingg harder to find and pricey. Edited February 1, 2008 by xXBlessedWithDeathXx Quote
inthemail Posted February 1, 2008 Author Report Posted February 1, 2008 word. so the 00 hubs and spindles i have will go on the j-arms? Quote
woodro77 Posted February 1, 2008 Report Posted February 1, 2008 (edited) i got two of them here if ya need it.! used front suspension parts may be cheaper to get for them. not sure if they're lighter or not. brake calipers and spindels are different too(i have a set of those as well). the original rear carrier is also a bit different on J-arm bikes but doesn't matter much. thats not true , the carrier is only different on the 87 , and the spindles and brakes are different on the 87 -88 , i had a 90 j-arm shee and the bearing carrier and the spindles were the same as the a arm . if you look in the repair manual it tells you the years parts are different . Edited February 1, 2008 by woodro77 Quote
xXBlessedWithDeathXx Posted February 2, 2008 Report Posted February 2, 2008 thats not true , the carrier is only different on the 87 , and the spindles and brakes are different on the 87 -88 , i had a 90 j-arm shee and the bearing carrier and the spindles were the same as the a arm . if you look in the repair manual it tells you the years parts are different . Thats not true hahaha. i also have a 89 banshee and i know the spindles dont fit 91 and after hubs. PUT THAT IN YOUR REPAIR MANUAL. Quote
xXBlessedWithDeathXx Posted February 2, 2008 Report Posted February 2, 2008 word. so the 00 hubs and spindles i have will go on the j-arms? yes :biggrin: Quote
pabansheematt Posted February 2, 2008 Report Posted February 2, 2008 yes :biggrin: 1990 was not j-arm. Quote
woodro77 Posted February 2, 2008 Report Posted February 2, 2008 1990 was not j-arm. yes it was ! Quote
woodro77 Posted February 2, 2008 Report Posted February 2, 2008 Thats not true hahaha. i also have a 89 banshee and i know the spindles dont fit 91 and after hubs. PUT THAT IN YOUR REPAIR MANUAL. i still have the spindles off my 1990 j arm and just put them next one of a 2002 and they are the exact same . but your probably right and the repair manual is wrong . Quote
nayr742003 Posted February 2, 2008 Report Posted February 2, 2008 I have a j-arm banshee and when i researched about them they were only 87 - 89 in 90 they changed but looking at this i didnt know that some of the things didnt interchange and the weight was so less;. Quote
inthemail Posted February 2, 2008 Author Report Posted February 2, 2008 damnit. i hate it when my posts gets good shit in it and i dont have time to read it gotta go to work to make banshee money .... Quote
notsed Posted February 2, 2008 Report Posted February 2, 2008 im confused, i have a 91 i thought it was j arm, now i feel stupid did i reed the frame # wrong or somethin? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.