Do mud sharks hook up as good as they look

[Ducman]

The mud sharks look pretty heavy but I'm not too worried about that and the price is right. I want to use 21" rears for a couple reasons (+4 swinger, 13/41 gearing) and need a lot of traction but there aren't many 21" choises available. I use 13T front in the sand and for some reason with the new swinger the chain adjustment will only fit a 13T or a 14T front, not both, so now I'm stuck with a 13 unless I get another chain 1 link longer for the 14T front. I could probably fit a 39T or 40T rear to go with 20" tires. Also, the +4 swinger makes it even harder to hook up in the dirt. I dont want to go with 22's, I rather go with 20" I-rasrs before i go 22's. Just wondering how many of you have ran the 21" GBC Mudsharks and how well you liked them. I need some mean traction in a bunch of different conditions including hill climbs, creek bed sand, gravel, rocks, dirt road, pretty much everything.

[2twin350s]

they hook ok. but they are too hard of a tire and wont hook on hard slick mudpack.i personally dont like them.one season and they dont hook at all. i really like the stock yfz 450 rear tires.they hook just as good as my mudmachines.but they give up a little ground clearence

Edited October 15, 2005 by 2twin350s